O
Lexington
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock ALPR cameras

Lexington

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (15)

At a glance

Public comments
18
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 27, 2026.

Public comments (20)

OpposedNoah CornetAug 27, 2026

Bluegrass DSA co-chair delivered a seven-point demand to cancel the Flock contract, delete data, and regulate ALPRs, citing abuses nationwide and reported data transfers to ICE.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 1:53:10 →
OpposedPete LynchAug 27, 2026

A UK politics teacher and congressional candidate urged extending the data center moratorium and ending the Flock contract, citing Harvard research on data center health impacts and the $2 million Flock cost.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 1:59:47 →
OpposedCatherine SchinnersAug 27, 2026

A Silicon Valley tech veteran who detailed Flock's new AI search capabilities and asked whether the city did due diligence, validated accuracy claims, or assessed liability before deployment.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:03:09 →
OpposedMel MoserAug 27, 2026

Detailed a security researcher's findings that Flock cameras ran unsupported Android software with 22 catalogued vulnerabilities, and cited Denver's decision to cut ties.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:08:12 →
OpposedLuke AllenAug 27, 2026

Catalogued dozens of cases of officers misusing ALPR data to stalk ex-partners, arguing the council can prevent the harm by removing the tool.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:14:50 →
OpposedSusan RahimzadaAug 27, 2026

Raised misread rates (37% in one trial), the lack of breakaway poles on camera mounts, and Flock employees' access to private camera feeds.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:19:32 →
SupportiveBilly MalloryAug 27, 2026

A First District resident who credited Flock and the real-time intelligence center with dramatically dropping East End violence and letting kids play outside again.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:25:21 →
SupportiveLisa GuessAug 27, 2026

President of the Community Police Academy Alumni Association defended LPD's audited, policy-bound use of ALPRs and its record of solving crimes and finding missing people.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:28:18 →
OpposedHerbert LynnAug 27, 2026

Documented wrongful detentions from misreads nationwide and a 71% false-positive rate on felony alerts in Sacramento; asked the council to send a 30-day cancellation notice.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:44:50 →
OpposedCorey EdwardsAug 27, 2026

Compared Lexington's $1.4M contract to Atlanta's 5,000 cameras that failed to improve crime statistics, and contrasted it with ONE Lexington's $200K youth violence budget.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:50:29 →
OpposedPaige HensleyAug 27, 2026

Showed the city's ALPR transparency page contains stale, pre-Flock-only data while 3,788 vehicle thefts have occurred since cameras were installed.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:54:06 →
OpposedHudson ChamberlainAug 27, 2026

A DSA organizer who noted nearly 100 governments have canceled Flock contracts, urged redirecting funds to community-based crime prevention, and demanded a permanent data center moratorium.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 2:57:15 →
OpposedDylan BourneAug 27, 2026

Argued the 'no expectation of privacy in public' claim doesn't justify mass plate collection, and warned about data being sold by a profit-driven private company.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:02:25 →
OpposedClay DavisAug 27, 2026

Director of We Watch Lexington, who has pushed a surveillance transparency ordinance for nearly a decade, urged its adoption as a middle ground while stating he wants the cameras gone.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:05:12 →
OpposedDrew HansenAug 27, 2026

Called Flock an authoritarian tool offering a false sense of security and urged cancellation.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:10:19 →
OpposedWilliam OsborneAug 27, 2026

A former political professional who cited the Supreme Court ruling, Shively stalking cases, and fiduciary duty concerns.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:13:41 →
OpposedCaitlin AdamsAug 27, 2026

Cited a Kentucky officer who searched an ex-girlfriend over 2,000 times across state lines, and urged contract cancellation.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:15:16 →
OpposedTrevor KnudsenAug 27, 2026

Warned of incremental escalation toward pervasive surveillance, from CCTV to AI to future biometric tracking.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:15:08 →
OpposedShannon DennistonAug 27, 2026

A Mount Sterling resident who detailed the searchable national database, the Flock Alpha drone, the heat-map controversy in Oshkosh, and Kentucky cities that have terminated Flock; demanded suspension and an independent audit.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:21:45 →
SupportiveVivian HodgeAug 27, 2026

Vice president of the William Wells Brown Neighborhood Association voiced East End support for more Flock cameras after touring the surveillance center.

Urban County Council Ad Valorem 2nd Reading — August 27, 2026 · 3:28:38 →